camo & animated cloth displays

14 August 2007

animated_textiles.jpg
two different concepts of wearable displays (or "performative textiles") shown at the recent siggraph conference.

kameraflage is a display garment with elements that appear only in digital photographs as a sort of digital camouflage. for instance, students at private schools & employees of chain-stores will be able to express themselves to their camera phone toting peers.

Animated Textiles uses cloth as an animated surface that is receptive & responsive to external stimuli. all electronic components such as LED lights & circuits are fully integrated into the fabric. in the future, both cloth & clothing will be able to display real-time data input from a variety of sources

[links: c0nn0r.info & hexagram.org|via guardian.co.uk]

add to delicious.gif add to digg

recent entries

air pollution helium balloon brand-based collaborative tag clouds tkaap video tracking interface BMW kinetic sculpture flokoon visual search pulsating emotion organism cinema redux film mosaics laser-cut sound analysis sculptures caffeine usage arcs zoomii visual amazon store mapping scientific citations collective prediction network all the water in the world reflect conversation table

extra

animated_textiles2.jpg

animated_textiles3.jpg

comments

I belive that the Kameraflage is fake / vaporware.

why? you just need something that shows up only in the near-infrared spectrum humans can't see (but most cameras do, although most are fitted with infrared-blocking filters, too in order to get a natural picture)
or the reflector foil people sometimes put on their number-plates, when these are flashed they reflect very strongly but under normal conditions they are transparent.
(the iphone shot may be fake having no flash and as I'm sure an ir-blocking filter)

here is connor's kameraflage site:

http://kameraflage.com/

I don't get it... why does the iPhone see it but the camera taking the picture doesn't?

Perhaps the I don't get it... why does the iPhone see it but the camera taking the picture doesn't?

Perhaps the camera taking the photo of everything is not digital, and therefore not IR sensitive? It's probably also possible to filter out the IR light to just about any camera. Then there's always just photoshopping after the fact, right?

shop

post a comment